Spondylolisthesis in myelomeningocele
© The Author(s) 2005
Published: 30 December 2005
The absence of important posterior elements in myelomeningocele (MMC) seems to justify a higher prevalence of spondylolisthesis among these patients regarding the normal population. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and the degree of slippage of spondylolisthesis in myelomeningocele patients.
Patients and methods
One hundred and thirty patients with myelomeningocele were randomly chosen from a roster of >500 patients with myelomeningocele followed at a multidisciplinary spina bifida unit in a tertiary university public hospital. A cross-sectional study was done collecting data from patient records and X-rays archives. X-rays measurements of sacral slope and grade of listhesis were standardized with AutoCad System. To study relationships among the variables, the Chi-squared, ANOVA tests were applied.
The mean age of this series was 24 years (range 2–53). 64 were male and 69 were female. 71,4% of patients had mid-lumbar, low-lumbar or sacral neurological levels. 16% had spondylolisthesis. The mean slippage was 21.6% (range 9–44), being 68,2% grade I and the remaining 31,8% grade II. The more frequent level for slippage was L5-S1. All the patients with spondylolisthesis were ambulators. The risk of spondylolisthesis was related with ambulation (p = 0.012). Ambulatory type (p = 0.035), functional ambulation type (p = 0.007) and lumbar hyperlordosis (p = 0.018) were also statistically related with the presence of spondylolisthesis.
Prevalence of spondylolisthesis in MMC is greater than in normal population (16% vs 5.8%). Gait related variables and hyperlordosis were related with the presence of spondylolisthesis.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.